![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3 This case is an attempt to hold the City liable for harms caused by third parties, in contradiction to the purpose of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. 2 Current foster care policies sufficiently protect foster children’s substantive due process rights, do not constitute deliberate indifference to their welfare, and are consistent with professional standards. 1 Defendants are entitled to summary judgment because Plaintiffs have failed to provide evidence for a necessary element of their § 1983 claim, namely, that Defendants’ policies or actions caused a violation of their constitutional rights. Click the highlighted text for the corresponding annotation.ĭefendants City of X, Howard Stens, Department of Children’s Services (DCS), Jeffrey Hights, Alice Hand, Samuel Addidge, Milly Tills, and Irene Constan request the court to enter summary judgment in their favor on all counts of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |